To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

Although Hjalmar Branting said The confederacy of Nations is not the only organization, albeit the most official, which has inscribe the maintenance of peace through law on its banner. , the adhesion of Nations was the most fortunate organization in the 1920s. There were three major reasons why the partnership was successful in the 1920s. They were victorious, because they settled disputes oer countries, had more organizations, and last but not least(prenominal) they were successful because of the signing of the Pact of Paris. In the 1920s the coalition of Nations managed to settle some(prenominal) disagreements between countries, which make the unify of Nations a successful organization. Although the League of Nations failed to prevent the annexing of Vilnius by Poland in 1922, or Italy invade Corfu in 1923, they also achieved good things. They solved the problem everyplace the Ã…land Island between Finland and Sweden. After the decision of the League of Nations th ose 6,500 islands remained a part of Finland but were govern by both countries . besides the League of Nations settled the argument over Upper Silesia by which Germany and Poland were involved. Both of the countries wanted to have to Upper Silesia and the League of Nations fearless to divide the land by two. And the last successful extinction in the 1920s was between Greece and Bulgaria in 1925.

The Greek invaded Bulgaria as a reply to the murdering of Greek people. The League interfered and Greece became angry about their decision, reminding them of the follow between Italy and Greece in 1923, where Italy attacked them and Greece ha d to pay Italy for that and apologize. Those! three incidents in the 1920s do the League a successful organization. An action which showed the success of the League of Nations was the establishment of organizations... If you want to get a full essay, duet it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay